DESIGNING AND DETAILING OF BUILDING SYSTEMS. MECHANICS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

Essential FEM statements applied to structural mechanics problems. Part 1

Vestnik MGSU 11/2014
  • Ignat’ev Aleksandr Vladimirovich - Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (VSUACE) Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Structural Mechanics, Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (VSUACE), 1 Akademicheskaya str., Volgograd, 400074, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 37-57

In the article, the author shares his classification of FEM statements that may serve as a guide in respect of the huge number of works that are published and being published with a view to the FEM efficiency improvement. The author provides a summarized history of the finite element method, and classifies its configurations and versions. The author also provides FEM statements applicable to the deflection method. Derivation of the rigidity matrix designated for shaft-based finite elements is demonstrated in the article. The author employs one-dimensional framing as an example aimed to demonstrate the convergence of the FEM method in terms of deflections, if the finite element grid is refined. However it is also noteworthy that in the event of a fine grid, the finite element designed for plates does not coincide with the finite element of a thin plate designed as the initial physical model. However, the system of equations, provided by the author, takes account of the influence produced by the load onto the finite element and generates the exact solution irrespective of any finite values of the length that are equal to the physical model of a finite element.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2014.11.37-57

References
  1. Ignat’ev V.A., Ignat’ev A.V., Zhidelev A.V. Smeshannaya forma metoda konechnykh elementov v zadachakh stroitel’noy mekhaniki [Mixed Form of Finite Element Method in Problems of Structural Mechanics]. Volgograd, VolgGASU Publ., 2006, 172 p. (In Russian).
  2. Hrennikoff A. Solution of problems in elasticity by the framework method. J. Appl. Mech. 1941, no. 8. Ser. A., pp. 169—175.
  3. McHenry D.A. Lattice Anthology of the Solution of Plane Stress Problems. J. Inst. Civ. Eng. 1943, no. 21, pp. 59—82.
  4. Newmark N.M. Numerical Methods of Analysis in Bars, Plates, and Elastic Bodies, "Numerical Methods in Analysis in Engineering". Ed. L.E. Grinter. Macmillan, 1949, pp. 313—344.
  5. Courant R. Variational Methods for the Solution of Problems of Equilibrium and Vibrations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 1943, vol. 49, pp. 1—23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1943-07818-4.
  6. Turner M.J., Clough R.W., Martin H.C., Topp L.J. Stiffness and Deflection Analysis of Complex Structures. J. Aero. Sci. 1956, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 805—824.
  7. Clough R.W. The Finite Element Method in Plane Stress Analysis. Proceedings of 2nd ASCE Conf. on Electronic Computation. Pittsburg, 1960.
  8. Argyris J.H. Energy Theorems and Structural Analysis. Aircraft Engineering. 1954, no. 26, pp. 347—356.
  9. Argyris J.H., Kelsey S. Energy Theorems and Structural Analysis. Butterwirth, London, 1960, 346 p.
  10. Argyris J. Triangular Elements with Linearly Varying Strain for the Matrix Displacement Method. J. Royal Aero. Sci. Tech. 1965, note 69, 711—713.
  11. Argyris J. Matrix Analysis of Three-dimensional Elastic Media — Small and Large Displacements. AIAA. 1965, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45—51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.2786.
  12. Oden J.T. Finite Elements on Nonlinear Continua. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972.
  13. Oden J.T. A General Theory of Finite Elements. Int. J. Num. Eng. 1969, no. 1, pp. 205—226, 247—260.
  14. Oden J.T., Reddy J.N. Some Observation on Properties of Certain Mixed Finite Element Approximations. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 1975, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 933—938. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620090412.
  15. Melosh R. Basis for Derivation of Matrices by the Direct Stiffness Method. AIAA J. 1963, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 1631—1637.
  16. Fraeijs de Veubeke B., Sander G. An Equilibrium Model for Plate Bending. International J. Solids and Structures. 1968, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 447—468. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(68)90049-8.
  17. Jones R.E. A Generalization of the Direct-stiffness Method of Structural Anaysis. AIAA J. 1964, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 821—826. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.2437.
  18. Zienkiewicz O.C., Cheung Y.K. The Finite Element Method in Structural and Continuum Mechanics. London, McGraw-Hill Book Company; First Edition, 1967, 274 p.
  19. Rozin L.A. Sterzhnevye sistemy, kak sistemy konechnykh elementov [Frame Structures as Systems of Finite Elements]. Leningrad, Leningrad State University Publ., 1976, 232 p. (In Russian).
  20. Rozin L.A. Metod konechnykh elementov v primenenii k uprugim sistemam [FEM in Application to Elastic Systems]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1977, 128 p. (In Russian).
  21. Postnov V.A., Kharkhurim I.Ya. Metod konechnykh elementov v raschetakh sudovykh konstruktsiy [FEM in Calculation of Ship Structures]. Leningrad, Sudostroenie Publ., 1974, 344 p. (In Russian).
  22. Strang G., Fix G. The Theory of Finite Element Method. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1977, 350 p.
  23. Strang G. and Fix G. An Analysis of the Finite Element Method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1973.
  24. Zienkiewicz O.C. The Finite Element Method — from Intuition to Generality. Appl. Mech. Rev., 1970, 23, 249—256.
  25. Felipa C. Refined finite element analysis of linear and non-linear two-dimensional structures. Univ. of California, Berkeley, str. Eng. Lab., Rep. SESM 66-22, 1966, 212 p.
  26. Adini A., Clough R. Analysis of Plate Bending by the Finite Element Method, Rept. To National Sci. Foundation, 1960.
  27. Herrmann L.R. Elasticity Equations for Incompressible and Nearly Incompressible Materials by a Variational Theorem. AIAA J. 1965, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1896—1900. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.3277.
  28. Herrmann L. A Bending Analysis for Plates. Proc. Conf. Matrix. Meth. Str. Mech. Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio, 1965.
  29. Herrmann L. Finite element bending analysis of plates. ASCE 93, No. EM5, 1967.
  30. Adini A. Analysis of Shell Structures by the Finite Element Method. Ph. D. Dis. Dept. Civil Eng. Univ. of California, Berkeley, 1961.
  31. Bogner F., Fox R., Schmit L. A Cylindrical Shell Discrete Element. AIAA. 1967, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 745—750. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.4056.
  32. Irons B.M., Zienkiewicz O.C. The Isoparametric Finite Element System — a New Concept in Finite Element Analysis. In Proc. Conf.: Recent Advances in Stress Analysis. Royal Aeronautical Society London, 1969.
  33. Clough R. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Finite Elements. Symp. Application of FEM in Civil Eng. Nashville, Ten. 1969, pp. 1—26.
  34. Pian T., Tong P. Basis for Finite Element Methods for Solid Continua. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 1969, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3—28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620010103.
  35. Atluri S., Tong P., Murakava H. Recent Studies in Hybrid and Mixed Finite Element Methods in Mechanics. Conf. Hybrid and Mixed M. John Wiley, 1983, pp. 51—71.
  36. Prato C. A Mixed Finite Element Method for Thin Shell Analysis. Ph. D. Th. Dept. Civil Eng. MIT, 1968.
  37. Connor J., Will D. A mixed finite element shallow shell formulation. Matrix Meth. Str. Anal. Design. Univ. Alabama, 1971, pp. 105—137.
  38. Poceski A. From Deformation to Mixed and Hybrid Formulation of the Finite Element Method. J. Theor. App. Mechanics, Yug. Society of Mechanics. Belgrade, 1979, no. 5.
  39. Poceski A., Simonee V. Metodot na koneeni elementi i hegovata primena. Gradezen fakultet, Skopje, 1972.
  40. Poceski A. A mixed finite element method for bending of plates. Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 1975, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3—15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620090102.
  41. Poceski A. Meovit metod na koneni elementi (111). 12 Jug. Kon. Teor. Prim. Mehanike, Ohrid, 1974.
  42. Brezzi F., Douglas J., Marini L.D. Two Families of Mixed Finite Elements for Second Order Elliptic Problems. Numer. Math. 1985, vol. 47, pp. 217—235. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01389710.
  43. Brezzi F., Douglas J., Fortin M., Marini L.D. Efficient Rectangular Mixed Finite Elements in Two and Three Space Variables. RAIRO Mod`el. Math. Anal. Numer. 1987, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 581—604.
  44. Maslennikov A.M. Raschet stroitel’nykh konstruktsiy chislennymi metodami [Calculation of Building Structures by Numerical Method]. Leningrad, LGU Publ., 1987, 224 p. (In Russian).
  45. Belkin A.E., Gavryushkin S.S. Raschety plastin metodom konechnykh elementov [Calculation of Plates by Finite Element Method]. Moscow, MGTU named after N.E. Baumana Publ., 2008, 232 p. (In Russian).
  46. Visser V. Uluchshennyy variant diskretnogo elementa smeshannogo tipa plastiny pri izgibe [Improved Variant of the Discreet Element of Mixed Type of a Plate at Bending]. Raketnaya tekhnika i kosmonavtika [Rocket Enineering and Space Technologies]. 1969, no. 9, pp. 172—174. (In Russian).
  47. Ayad R., Dhatt G., Batoz J.L. A New Hybrid-mixed Variational Approach for Reissner-Mindlin plates. The MiSP model. International J. for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 1998, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1149—1179. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980815)42:7<1149::AID-NME391>3.0.CO;2-2
  48. Nedelec J.C. Mixed Finite Elements in R3. Numerische Mathematik, September 1980, 35(3), pp. 315—341.
  49. Poceski A. Mixed Finite Element Method. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1992, 356 p.
  50. Sekulovich M. Metod konechnykh elementov [Finite Element Method]. Translation from Serbian. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1993, 664 p.
  51. Bathe K.-J., Wilson E.L. Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1976, 528 p.
  52. Bathe K.-Yu. Metody konechnykh elementov [Finite Elements Methods]. Transl. Into Russian. Moscow, FIZMATLIT Publ., 2010, 1024 p.
  53. Bathe K.J. Finite Element Procedures. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1996, 1036 p.
  54. Bathe K.J., Wilson E.L. Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 1976.
  55. Vasidzu K. Variatsionnye metody v teorii uprugosti i plastichnosti [Variation Methods in Plasticity Theory]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1987, 542 p. (In Russian).
  56. Gallager R. Metod konechnykh elementov. Osnovy [Finite Element Method. Basics]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1984, 428 p. (In Russian).
  57. Zenkevich O.K., Morgan K. Konechnye elementy i approksimatsiya [Finite Elements and Approximation]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1986, 318 p. (In Russian).
  58. Morrey D.O. O skhodimosti resheniy v metode konechnykh elementov [On Solutions’ Convegence in Finite Element Method]. Raketnaya tekhnika i kosmonavtika [Rocket Enineering and Space Technologies]. 1970, no. 4, pp. 112—114. (In Russian).
  59. Bazeley G.P., Cheung Y.K., Irons B.M., Zienkiewicz O.C. Triangular Elements in Plate Bending — Conforming and Non-conforming Solutions. Proc. Conf. On Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics. Air Force Inst. of Tech., Wright Patterson A. F. Base, Ohio, 1965, pp. 547—576.
  60. Marchuk G.I., Agoshkov V.I. Vvedenie v proektsionno-setochnye metody [Introduction into Projective Grid Methods]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1981, 416 p. (In Russian).
  61. Zenkevich O.K. Metod konechnykh elementov v tekhnike [Finite Element Method in Technology]. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1975, 541 p.
  62. Ignat’ev V.A. Metod konechnykh elementov v zadachakh stroitel’noy mekhaniki [Finite Element Method in Problems of Structural Mechanics]. Saratov, Saratov University Publ., 1980, 87 p. (In Russian).
  63. Chuvikovskiy V.S. Chislennye metody raschetov v stroitel’noy mekhanike korablya [Numerical Calculation Methods in Structural Mechanics of Ships]. Leningrad, Sudostroenie Publ., 1976, 376 p.

Download

Analysis and estimation of risk management methods

Vestnik MGSU 5/2016
  • Kankhva Vadim Sergeevich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Candidate of Economical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Economy and Management in the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Efremyan Boris Levonovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) postgraduate student, Department of Economy and Management in the Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 107-118

At the present time risk management is an integral part of state policy in all the countries with developed market economy. Companies dealing with consulting services and implementation of the risk management systems carve out a niche. Unfortunately, conscious preventive risk management in Russia is still far from the level of standardized process of a construction company activity, which often leads to scandals and disapproval in case of unprofessional implementation of projects. The authors present the results of the investigation of the modern understanding of the existing methodology classification and offer the authorial concept of classification matrix of risk management methods. Creation of the developed matrix is based on the analysis of the method in the context of incoming and outgoing transformed information, which may include different elements of risk control stages. So the offered approach allows analyzing the possibilities of each method.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.5.107-118

References
  1. Khokhlov N.V. Upravlenie riskom [Risk Management]. Moscow, YuNITI Publ., 1999, 239 p. (In Russian)
  2. Dmitriev M.V., Koshechkin S.A. Kolichestvennyy analiz riska investitsionnykh proektov [Qualitative Risk Analysis of Investment Projects]. Korporativnyy menedzhment [Corporate Management]. Available at: http://www.cfin.ru/finanalysis/quant_risk.shtml. (In Russian)
  3. Moskvin V.A. Upravlenie riskami pri realizatsii investitsionnykh proektov [Risk Management in the Implementation of Investment Projects]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2004, 350 p. (In Russian)
  4. Girmscheild G. Projektabwicklungin der Bauwirstchaft — Wege zur Win-Win-Situaition für Auftragsnehmer. Berlin, Springer, 2004, 450 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72555-8.
  5. Schnorrenberg U., Goebels G. Risikomanagement in Projekten. Braunschweig, Vieweg, 1999.
  6. Willians T.M. Risk-Management Infrastructures. International Journal of Project Management. 1993, vol. 11(1), pp. 5—10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(93)90003-6.
  7. Lankina S.A. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi riskami na raznykh stadiyakh investitsionnogo tsikla v stroitel’nom komplekse: dissertatsiya … kandidata ekonomicheskikh nauk [Economical Risk Management on Different Stages of Investment Cycle in the Construction Complex : dissertation of the Candidate of Economical Sciences]. Moscow, 2005, 164 p. (In Russian)
  8. Goncharenko L.P., Filin S.A. Risk-menedzhment [Risk Management]. 3rd edition. Moscow, KnoRus Publ., 2008, 215 p. (In Russian)
  9. Kropotina O.E. Razvitie sistemy upravleniya riskami promyshlennykh predpriyatiy s uchetom ikh otsenki i strakhovaniya: dissertatsiya … kandidata ekonomicheskikh nauk [Development of Risk Management of Industrial Enterprises with Account for Their Estimation and Insurance dissertation of the Candidate of Economical Sciences]. Moscow, 2010, 164 p. (In Russian)
  10. Tsay T.N. Konkurentsiya i upravlenie riskami na predpriyatiyakh v usloviyakh rynka [Competition and Risk Management on Enterprises in Market Conditions]. Moscow, Alans Publ., 1997, 288 p. (In Russian)
  11. Ermasova N.B. Risk-menedzhment organizatsii [Risk Management in a Company]. Moscow, Dashkov i K Publ., 2014, 380 p. (In Russian)
  12. Dorokhina, E.Yu. Metodologiya upravleniya riskami proektno-orientirovannogo predpriyatiya : na primere predpriyatiya stroitel’noy otrosli : dissertatsiya … doktora ekonomicheskikh nauk [Risk Management Methodology of a Project-Oriented Enterprise : on the Example of a Construction Enterprise : dissertation of the Doctor of Economical Sciences]. Saint Petersburg, 2011, 348 p. (In Russian)
  13. Fedos’ina A.V. Metody snizheniya riskov innovatsionnykh protsessov [Risk Mitigation Methods of Innovative Processes]. Aktual’nye problemy menedzhmenta predpriyatiy investitsionno-stroitel’noy sfery: sbornik trudov [Current Problems of Management of the Enterprises of Investment and Construction Sphere : Collection of Works]. Moscow, MGSU, 2010, no. 4, pp. 103—111. (In Russian)
  14. Ivanov N.A., Ivanova M.A. Semanticheskaya set’ kak sposob predstavleniya zapisey o nesootvetstviyakh v sistemakh upravleniya kachestvom [Semantic Net as a Method of Presenting Entries for Nonconformities in Quality Management Systems]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo [Economy and Entrepreneurship]. 2014, no. 9 (50), pp. 821—823. (In Russian)
  15. Kankhva V.S., Neretin M.V. Klassifikatsiya riskov organizatsiy stroitel’noy otrasli i metody ikh snizheniya [Classification of Risks of Construction Enterprises and Methods of Their Reduction]. Ekonomika i upravlenie narodnym khozyaystvom [Economy and Management of the National Economy]. 2014, no. 1—2, pp. 64—67. (In Russian)
  16. Kankhva V.S., Efremyan B.L. Klassifikatsiya riskov po urovnyam operatsionnogo upravleniya [Risk Classification According to Levels of Operational Management]. Nauchnoe obozrenie [Scientific Review]. 2015, no. 12, pp. 295—298. (In Russian)
  17. Panteleeva M.S., Gorobnyak A.A., Borozdina S.M. Otsenka effektivnosti funktsionirovaniya organizatsionnoy struktury marketinga dlya stroitel’nogo predpriyatiya [Efficiency Estimation of Marketing Structure Organization for a Construction Enterprise]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo [Economy and Entrepreneurship]. 2015, no. 6—3 (59—3), pp. 491—496. (In Russian)
  18. Trifonov D.A. Mesto risk-menedzhmenta v obshchey strategii upravleniya bankom [Place of Risk Management in the General Strategy of Bank Management]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Global Economic System]. 2010, vol. 3, no. 2, pp.169—173. (In Russian)
  19. Uvarova S.S., Papel’nyuk O.V., Panenkov A.A. Kontseptual’nye i metodicheskie aspekty upravleniya innovatsionnym razvitiem stroitel’nogo predpriyatiya v proektsii teorii organizatsionno-ekonomicheskikh izmeneniy [Conceptual and Methodological Aspects of Innovative Development Management of a Construction Enterprise According to the Theory of Organizational and Economical Changes]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo [Economy and Entrepreneurship]. 2015, no. 3—2 (56—2), pp. 809—811. (In Russian)
  20. Silka D.N. Mechanisms to Actuate Growth in Conditions of Stagnation of Russian Economy. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2014, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 148—150. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.31.01.14289.

Download

Principles of classification of soilmasses for construction purposes

Vestnik MGSU 9/2013
  • Chernyshev Sergey Nikolaevich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU) Doctor of Geologo-Mineralogical Sciences, Professor, Department of Engineering Geology and Geoecology, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU), 26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 41-46

The author proposes original grounds for the classification of the full range of soil masses as a supplement to the classification of soils provided in GOST 25100—2011. The author proposes four classes of soil masses, each class having several types and sub-types of soils. The classification will improve the accuracy of engineering and geological surveys and computer models of the geological environment developed for the purpose of design of buildings and structures. The author offers a classification of soils to identify the geological environment comprising one or more types of soil which are genetically and structurally distinct. Any soil mass type differs by its origin, and, as a consequence, its internal geological structure, stress-strain state and inherent geological processes. Any genetically isolated type of soils a specific program of research, both in terms of methods and in terms of density testing in the point of sampling. The behavior of rock masses together with the engineering structure is pre-determined by the properties of the rock, its relative position (geological structure), a network of cracks and other weakening factors, and the natural state of stress. The fracture network is of paramount importance. Cracks are characterized by direction, length, width, surface roughness of walls, and a distance between parallel cracks.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2013.9.41-46

References
  1. Pashkin E.M., Kagan A.A., Krivonogova N.F.; Pashkina E.M., editor. Terminologicheskiy spravochnik po inzhenernoy geologii [Reference Book of Terms of Engineering Geology]. Moscow, KDU Publ., 2011, 952 p.
  2. Panyukov P.N. Inzhenernaya geologiya [Engineering Geology]. Moscow, Gosgortekhizdat Publ., 1962.
  3. Bondarik G.K. Teoriya geologicheskogo polya [Geological Field Theory]. Moscow, MIMS Publ., 2002, 129 p.
  4. Belyi L.D. Obshie principial'nye polozheniya [General Principal Provisions]. In the book: Geologiya i plotiny [Geology and Dams]. Moscow — Leningrad, Gosenergoizdat Publ., 1959, pp. 9—19.
  5. Muller L. Der Felsbau. Ferdinand Enke Verlag. Stuttgart, 1963, 453 p.
  6. Bauduin C.M. Determination of Characteristic Values. In: U. Smoltczyk, editor, Geotechnical Engineering Handbook. Berlin, Ernst Publ., 2002, vol. I, pp. 17—50.
  7. Frank R., Kovarik J.B. Comparasion des niveaux de modele pour la resistance ultime des pieux sous charges axiales. Revue Francaise de Geotechnique. 2005, 110, pp. 12—25.
  8. Belyi L.D. Osnovy teorii inzhenerno-geologicheskogo kartirovaniya [Fundamentals of the Theory of Engineering Geological Mapping]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1964.

Download

CLASSIFICATION OF PROCESSES: SOME ASPECTS OF APPLICATION

Vestnik MGSU 7/2016
  • Patrusova Alena Mikhaylovna - 40 Makarenko str., Bratsk, 665709, Russian Federation Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, dean, Department of Extra-Mural and Accelerated Education, 40 Makarenko str., Bratsk, 665709, Russian Federation, ; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 142-151

Classification of the processes in an enterprise is a methodical basis for the solution of the problems of identification and reference of processes to concrete category depending on a classification sign that in turn is the basis for the choice of management tools of the processes and of an enterprise in general. The classification of processes is one of the problems of information search consisting in reference of the process to one of several categories on the basis of certain classification criterion. Rather often some authors make terminological mistake in their works when they refer to all the processes at an enterprise to the category “business process”, including management processes, and supporting processes. The classification of the processes of an enterprise has to be carried out with a definite purpose: it can be carried out for ensuring systematic studying and completeness of coverage of the studied subject domain, or for the purpose of business management on the basis of process approach. The first purpose provides exclusively analytical character of solvable tasks of studying the processes of the enterprise and doesn’t allow developing recommendations on the solution of management problems of the organization. In the second case it is quite possible to use classification of processes of an economic entity as a business management mechanism basis on the ground of process approach. According to the offered classification three groups of processes of the enterprise are defined: management processes (management), business processes (the main processes) and the providing (auxiliary) processes. These classification criteria will allow identifying the processes of the enterprise and defining the system of their interaction. The hierarchy level of the processes allows determining the duration of life cycle of the processes and is the basis for processes planning. Vertical and horizontal processes allow defining the roles, powers and responsibility of linear and functional heads of the organization. Depending on the scale of the organization the presented classification can be concretized concerning business processes. The developed classification allows referring any process of the enterprise to one of the categories, determining the level of its hierarchy and its orientation which is a basis of the choice and formation of management instruments of processes and of an enterprises in general.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2016.7.142-151

References
  1. Belokobyl’skiy S.V., Lyublinskiy V.A., Lukovnikova E.I., Patrusova A.M. Podkhody k razrabotke mekhanizmov transfera innovatsionnykh nauchnykh dostizheniy v sfere vuza i predpriyatiy [Approaches to the Development of Transfer Mechanism of Innovative Scientific Achievements in the Sphere of Higher Institutions and Enterprises]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sibiri [Problems of Social and Economic Development of Social and Economical Development of Siberia]. 2013, no. 4 (14), pp. 9—13. (In Russian)
  2. Vasilyeva Z.A. Development Management on a Regional Level. Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki [Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences]. 2013, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1710—1720.
  3. Badeeva E.A., Volodin V.M., Murashkina T.I. Formirovanie innovatsionnykh podkhodov v upravlenii uchrezhdeniyami vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Formation of Innovative Approaches in Management of Higher Educational Institutions in the Russian Federation]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education]. 2014, no. 3, article 389. (In Russian)
  4. Slepenko E.D., Patrusova A.M. Spetsifika otsenki pokazateley kachestva obrazovatel’nogo protsessa [Characteristics of Quality Index Estimation of Educational Process]. Trudy Bratskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Bratsk State University Scientific Journal. Series: Economy and Management]. 2012, vol. 1, pp. 146—150. (In Russian)
  5. Kosyakova V.V., Boyarchuk N.Ya., Vasil’eva S.A. Faktory konkurentosposobnosti roznichnykh torgovykh organizatsiy [competitive differentiator of Retail Trade Organizations]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sibiri [Issues of Social-Economic Development of Siberia]. 2013, no. 3 (13), pp. 16—21. (In Russian)
  6. Kosyakova V.V. O sovershenstvovanii stilya upravleniya promyshlennymi predpriyatiyami severo-irkutskoy territorial’no-proizvodstvennoy zony [On Advancing the Management Style of Industrial Enterprises of North Irkutsk Territorial-Industrial Area]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sibiri [Issues of Social-Economic Development of Siberia]. 2014, no. 1 (15), pp. 63—65. (In Russian)
  7. Kharitonova P.V. Metodicheskiy podkhod k kachestvennoy otsenke nematerial’nykh resursov [Methodological Approach to Qualitative Assessment of Immaterial Resources]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sibiri [Issues of Social-Economic Development of Siberia]. 2014, no. 1 (15), pp. 83—87. (In Russian)
  8. Patrusova A.M., Sygotina M.V., Plankova Yu.V., Mooi E. Primenenie metodov informatsionnogo menedzhmenta dlya otsenki effektivnosti investitsionnykh IT-proektov [Using the Methods of Informational Management for Efficiency Estimation of Investment IT Projects]. Sistemy. Metody. Tekhnologii [Systems. Methods. Technologies]. 2014, no. 4 (24), pp. 62—67. (In Russian)
  9. Sygotina M.V. Reshenie prikladnykh zadach proizvodstvennogo menedzhmenta s primeneniem innovatsionnykh proektov [Solving Applied Problems of Production Management Using Innovative Projects]. Trudy Bratskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Bratsk State University Scientific Journal. Series: Economy and Management]. 2013, vol. 1, pp. 284—287. (In Russian)
  10. GOST R ISO 9001—2008. Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva. Trebovaniya [Russian State Standard GOST R ISO 9001—2008. Quality Management Systems. Requirements]. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2008, 65 p. (In Russian)
  11. Ostroukhova N.G. Biznes-protsessy predpriyatiy TEK: ponyatie, soderzhanie, klassifikatsiya [Business Processes of Fuel and Energy Complexes: Notion, Content, Classification]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola [Siberian Financial School]. 2012, no. 1 (90), pp. 118—122. (In Russian)
  12. Vandina O.G. Otraslevye osobennosti formirovaniya biznes-protsessov stroitel’nykh organizatsiy [Industry Characteristics of Business Processes Formation of Construction Organizations]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [News of the Volgograd State Pedagogica lUniversity]. 2014, no. 3 (88), pp. 126—132. (In Russian)
  13. Amirkhanov K.G. Biznes-protsessy promyshlennogo predpriyatiya: ponyatie i klassifikatsiya [Business Processes of Industrial Enterprise: Notion and Classification]. Voprosy strukturizatsii ekonomiki [Issues of Economy Structuring]. 2005, no. 2, pp. 140—149. (In Russian)
  14. Panin A.V. Upravlenie predpriyatiem cherez identifikatsiyu i klassifikatsiyu protsessov [Management of an Enterprise Using Identification and Classification of Processes]. Terra Economicus. 2007, vol. 5, no. 3—3, pp. 224—228. (In Russian)
  15. Peryazeva E.K., Marchenko S.D., Ivanov A.I., Andreeva D.M. Klassifikatsiya protsessov farmatsevticheskogo predpriyatiya [Classification of the Processes of a Pharmaceutical Enterprise]. Farmatsiya [Pharmacy]. 2010, no. 8, pp. 34—35. (In Russian)
  16. Frolov T.Yu. Klassifikatsiya innovatsionnykh protsessov na neftegazovykh predpriyatiyakh [Classification of Innovative Processes on Oil and Gas Enterprises]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [News of St. Petersburg State University of Economics]. 2016, no. 2 (98), pp. 131—134. (In Russian)
  17. Cherutova M.I., Patrusova A.M., Trapeznikova E.V. Tsentr innovatsionnykh metodov upravleniya [Center of Innovative Management Methods]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sibiri [Issues of Social-Economic Development of Siberia]. 2012, no. 2 (7), pp. 23—26. (In Russian)
  18. Boyarchuk N.Ya., Zverintsev S.A. Razrabotka kontseptual’noy modeli analiza finansovo-khozyaystvennoy deyatel’nosti predpriyatiya [Development of the Conceptual Model for Analyzing Financial and Economic Activity of an Enterprise]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sibiri [Issues of Social-Economic Development of Siberia]. 2013, no. 3 (13), pp. 9—16. (In Russian)
  19. Slepenko E.D. Formirovanie i uchet raskhodov kommercheskoy organizatsii v sootvetstvii s zakonodatel’stvom Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Formation and Account of the Expenses of a Commercial Organization in Correspondence with the Laws of the Russian Federation]. Trudy Bratskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Bratsk State University Scientific Journal. Series: Economy and Management]. 2015, vol. 1, pp. 127—132. (In Russian)
  20. Magomedova N.G. Klassifikatsiya biznes-protsessov na agropromyshlennykh predpriyatiyakh [Classification of Business Processes on Agro-Industrial Enterprises]. Voprosy strukturizatsii ekonomiki [Issues of Economy Structuring]. 2012, no. 1, pp. 41—45. (In Russian)
  21. Gubareva T.V., Lukovnikova E.I. Osobennosti primeneniya novykh informatsionnykh tekhnologiy bol’shikh dannykh [Features of Using New Information Technologies of Big Data]. Problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sibiri [Issues of Social-Economic Development of Siberia]. 2015, no. 2 (20), pp. 24—31. (In Russian)
  22. Giniyatullina E.Z., Stremilova A.V. K voprosu o pravovom regulirovanii obshchestvennykh otnosheniy v sfere informatsionnykh tekhnologiy [To the Issue of Legal Regulation of Public Relations in the Field of Information Technologies]. Crede Experto: transport, obshchestvo, obrazovanie, yazyk [Crede Experto: Transport, Society, Education, Language]. 2016, no. 1, pp. 133—139. (In Russian)
  23. Gorbunova O.N., Shestakova Yu.V. Problemy razvitiya IT-tekhnologiy v bankovskom sektore Rossii v usloviyakh sanktsiy [Development Issues of IT Technologies in the Banking Sector of Russia in the Conditions of Sanctions]. Crede Experto: transport, obshchestvo, obrazovanie, yazyk [Crede Experto: Transport, Society, Education, Language]. 2015, no. 4, pp. 238—244. (In Russian)
  24. Vakhrusheva M.Yu. Avtomatizatsiya monitoringa reytingovykh pokazateley v sisteme menedzhmenta kachestva vuza [Automation of Rating Indicators Monitoring in the Management System of University Quality]. Trudy Bratskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Bratsk State University Scientific Journal. Series: Economy and Management]. 2015, vol. 1, pp. 193—199. (In Russian)
  25. Vakhrusheva M.Yu. Metodicheskie i organizatsionnye printsipy sozdaniya AIS predpriyatiya [Methodological and Organizational Principles of Creating Automated Information System of an Enterprise]. Trudy Bratskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Bratsk State University Scientific Journal. Series: Economy and Management]. 2015, vol. 1, pp. 189—193. (In Russian)

Download

MODELING OF DESIGN PROCESS AUTOMATION FOR LOGISTICS SYSTEMS AND DATA FLOW PROCESSES IN CONSTRUCTION

Vestnik MGSU 1/2012
  • Martinson Oleg Evgenievich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MSUCE) graduate student of information systems, technology and automation in construction (ISTAS) +7-(499)-183-49-06, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MSUCE), 26, Jaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Fahratov Victor Muhammetovich - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MSUCE) graduate student of information systems, technology and automation in construction (ISTAS) +7-(499)-183-49-06, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MSUCE), 26, Jaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Selezneva Elena Vjzcheslavovna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MSUCE) applicant department of information systems, technology and automation in construction (ISTAS) +7-(499)-183-49-06, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MSUCE), 26, Jaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
  • Kulikova Ekaterina Nikolajevna - Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MSUCE) candidate technical sciences, assistant professor of information systems, technology and automation in construction (ISTAS) +7-(499)-183-49-06, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MSUCE), 26, Jaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337, Russia; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Pages 188 - 191

The authors set out the basic principles for development of logistics systems models. Additionally detailed classification of models and modeling methods for such systems are described in the paper.

DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2012.1.188 - 191

References
  1. Stakhanov E.N., Ivakin, E.?. Logistika v stroitel'stve [Logistics in construction]. Moscow, Prior, 2001, 176 p.
  2. Zhavoronkov E.P. Jeffektivnost' logistiki v stroitel'stve [Efficiency of logistics in construction]. Moscow, KIA Zentr, 2002, 136 c.

Download

Results 1 - 5 of 5